The Prichard Blog has a story today on what has happened to school facilities in Kentucky since the Rose case. That’s the case that determined that Kentucky’s school funding was inadequate and mandated a new formula. It’s what led up to KERA and the SEEK funding formula.
The study, by Caroline Wilson, details the impact on student learning of school facilities.
Specifically, Wilson notes:
The findings suggest that the additional facilities funding since the Rose decision created a teaching and learning environment that supported the tenets of an adequate education that previously had not been realized.
That is to say that the Rose decision had a positive impact on the facilities available for student learning and that this, in turn, positively impacted student learning.
Wilson examined 5 building features to determine first, if they had improved and then, if the improvement had impacted student learning.
The features included:
Five features were selected for examination: security, technological readiness, lighting, thermal comfort and air quality.
The full study details exactly how the Rose decision impacted facility funding in Kentucky and how it specifically impacted the student learning environment under study.
The bottom line is this: The study suggests that the funding formula changes after the Rose decision have improved the learning environment for Kentucky kids. Kentucky has continued to fund education reform and it appears to be paying off in terms of improved facilities and better outcomes for students.
For more on Kentucky education policy and politics, follow @KYEdReport